HMICFRS Inspection Reports

 

 

 

 

The PCC has a statutory duty to comment on reports published by HMICFRS about Sussex Police. To make these easily accessible and to keep the public fully informed about any responses the PCC has made to HMICFRS, a copy of the response will be published below, together with links to the relevant report.  

On behalf of the national Rape Monitoring Group (RMG), HMIC has published 42 local area digests (for police-recorded data the Metropolitan Police Service and the City of London are combined to make up the London local area) to provide a data set to enable more thorough analysis of how rape is dealt with in a particular area of England and Wales. The RMG will regularly review these digests with a view to enhancing the quantity and quality of the information they contain, so that the right questions and interventions can be made in driving improvements in this important area of work. These local area digests pull together a range of Home Office, Office for National Statistics, Crown Prosecution Service and Ministry of Justice data on rape in one place, and include the following: Police-recorded data on rape, broken down by adult or child, comprising:

  • the number of recorded rapes;
  • how many rapes were initially recorded as such, but then declassified to no-crimes; and
  • how many recorded rapes resulted in the suspect receiving a charge/summons.

Data from the Crown Prosecution Service, comprising:

  • the number of cases, by suspect, referred to the Crown Prosecution Service by the force for a decision on whether or not to charge with rape, and the number of defendants charged with rape; and
  • the number of prosecutions and the number of convictions, by defendant, and the reasons for other prosecution outcomes.

Data from the Ministry of Justice, comprising:

  • the number of prosecutions and convictions;
  • the time taken from charge to completion of proceedings; and
  • the average custodial sentence lengths for convicted offenders.

The data from the different organisations are collected over different timescales, numbers refer to either number of offences or number of suspects/defendants, and the way rape cases are identified varies between data collections. These factors, together with the time lag between different stages in the criminal justice process, mean that every data set may not refer to the same cohort of cases, and they are not directly comparable. The digest for Sussex can be viewed here.

 

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

This HMIC inspection looked at how well police forces understand the demand for their service and how well they match their resources to that demand and provides an assessment of their efficiency. The efficiency report will be followed by reports on effectiveness and legitimacy in early 2016, which together make up the three pillars of the annual PEEL assessment. The national report can be viewed here. The Sussex report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

In March 2013, HMIC published “Mistakes were made” which was a review into allegations and intelligence material concerning Jimmy Savile between 1964 and 2012. The report concluded that mistakes had been made in the handling of information and allegations into sexual abuse, and committed to a further review of information management practices. In May 2014, HMIC conducted a further review of the business processes which police forces in England and Wales use to collect, record, process, evaluate and share information. The national report can be viewed here. The Sussex report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

The HMIC report, "Stop and Search Powers 2", sets out the findings of an inspection into the progress made by police forces since HMIC’s 2013 report, "Stop and Search Powers: Are the police using them effectively and fairly?". It also addresses the Home Secretary’s new commission for HMIC to examine the way the police use powers to stop motor vehicles and strip search people. The national report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

On behalf of the Rape Monitoring Group, HMIC has published 43 force reports showing police data on how many rapes were recorded by the police in each force, and the outcomes. For both adults and children, the force digests:

  • show the number of recorded rapes per 100,000 people in the area;
  • show forces’ sanction detection rates for rape;
  • show the rate at which rape was classed as ‘no crime rate’ by the force;
  • allow data from each police force to be seen alongside the data for other individual forces in England and Wales; and
  • show trends in recorded rape over time.

The digest for Sussex can be viewed here.

 

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

The HMIC report, "The Welfare of Vulnerable People in Police Custody", examines the welfare of vulnerable people in police custody “including, but not limited to, those with mental health problems, those from black and minority ethnic backgrounds and children”. In particular, the Home Secretary asked HMIC to consider groups for whom there has been “a pronounced concern” about their treatment in police custody. The national report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

The HMIC report, "Integrity Matters", examines the capability of all police forces in England and Wales to address misconduct and ensure than appropriate processes are in place to prevent and tackle corruption. The national report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

PEEL is the programme in which HMIC draws together evidence from its annual all-force inspections. The evidence is used to assess the effectiveness, efficiency and legitimacy of the police. HMIC has introduced these assessments so that the public will be able to judge the performance of their force and policing as a whole. The effectiveness of a force is assessed in relation to how it carries out its responsibilities including cutting crime, protecting the vulnerable, tackling anti-social behaviour, and dealing with emergencies and other calls for service. Its efficiency is assessed in relation to how it provides value for money. Its legitimacy is assessed in relation to whether the force operates fairly, ethically and within the law. The evidence from inspections, together with the context within which forces operate, allows HMIC to make an assessment of each of the 43 police forces in England and Wales. In recent years, HMIC has undertaken inspections of specific subjects or services, known as thematic inspections. These consider subjects in depth, identifying problems and good practice, and providing detailed judgments in relation to specific aspects of policing. Even when the findings of thematic inspections are viewed together, they cannot provide a rounded assessment of every aspect of what police forces do. PEEL has been developed to fill this gap. The 2014 PEEL assessment is the first step away from a thematic approach towards one which will consider the full breadth and complexity of what the police do, using criteria that allow graded judgments to be made. Thematic inspections will continue to be used to complement and contribute to the PEEL annual assessment. The Sussex "Crime Inspection 2014" report can be viewed here. The Sussex "Police Integrity and Corruption" report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

In its 2013/2014 inspection programme, approved by the Home Secretary under section 54 of the Police Act 1996, HMIC committed to carry out an inspection into the way the 43 police forces in England and Wales record crime data. This inspection, carried out between February and August 2014, was the most extensive of its kind that HMIC has ever undertaken into crime data integrity. The report includes specific recommendations for each force on how to improve the accuracy of, and therefore public confidence in, the way the police records crime. The national report can be viewed here. The Sussex report can be viewed here.

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.

In July 2012, the Home Office published the Strategic Policing Requirement (SPR). The document sets out the threats that require a national policing capability to ensure they are tackled effectively. The threats are:

  • Terrorism
  • Civil emergencies
  • Organised crime
  • Threats to public order
  • A large-scale cyber incident

All forces and Police and Crime Commissioners must have regard to the SPR when setting their local policing plans. The SPR states that HMIC will provide assurance that the preparation and delivery of those requirements set out in the SPR have been subject to a proportionate and risk-based testing and inspection regime. The HMIC report, "The Strategic Policing Requirement: An inspection of the arrangements that police forces have in place to meet the SPR", examines how well police forces have established the arrangements that the SPR requires them to have in place to counter a number of specified threats to national security and public safety. It is based on data and documentary evidence provided by all 43 police forces in England and Wales in July 2013. The national report can be viewed here. The Sussex report can be viewed here.

 

PCC's Response

The PCC's response can be viewed here.